Comment by mpweiher
That is incorrect.What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -- Hitchen's Razor, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchens%27s_razor
You made a claim that you did not support with any evidence whatsoever. Twice, actually.
So it is you has to "do better than that", not me.
In fact, I actually did go to the trouble of disproving your first unproven claim with actual data, which was more than I had to do. A simple "wrong" would have sufficed there as well.
You just wiped that away with another completely unsupported and also wrong assertion.
And if "all of the public figures" support your position, it would be trivial to actually cite that evidence. [Narrator: it won't, because they don't].
Nuclear power is cheap, as the IEA data clearly shows, in addition to all the real-world evidence.
And your point on the Ukraine war is also the exact opposite of the truth: if you actually look at the evidence, or ask the Ukrainians, you will find that nuclear power is what is keeping the country afloat, energy-wise.
Which is why Ukraine has started construction of at least two more nuclear reactors during this war:
https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/work-under-way-f...
And has ordered a total of nine AP-1000s
https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/interview/1169371.html
But hey, what do the Ukrainians know about nuclear power in Ukraine?