Have you ever been able to code in the first place?

Have you ever been able to code in the first place?

Have you ever been able to code in the first place?

It started like this. I programmed in Pascal when I was in school. I learned basic. I learned assembler. I literally assembled code. Sometimes I thought it out, planned it, and created for that time quite elaborate code, controlling a panoramic head, for instance, things like that. So at this time, I was really proud of myself. I was good at this. I was getting better.

And fast forward to today, you have AI and vibe coding. Back in the day, often when I got an error message, I just looked on the internet and tried something out, did trial and error. After a while, it worked either with my own code or with code from a GitHub repository.

Today I don't even do that. All I do is I start the Gemini CLI and have it code for me. And then I watch some video unless it has some issues. I noticed that the code is better and it all comes down to good description of the problem.

I noticed the problems that I fought with for ages, that I spent hours with debugging and shit. It just created in 15 minutes. So I was wondering, was I even ever able to code? Or was it just a huge waste of time?

Because now I can see it from the outside and see the amount of time that I would have used to debug this and to write it in the first place, then copy paste it from other sources, which might be outdated. I would have done something for five days.

Partly I would be excited about this. Yes, sure, it's challenging your brain, but ultimately you have something and you're probably not even that excited about it.

Have you ever been really able to code? Or was it more like trying something, it doesn't really work, you ask in a forum like Stack Overflow, and if that still doesn't work, you just do something else?

I had Pascal in school, later at university Java for the first time. I programmed a little afterwards for Android, given that it was also Java. But often it was Stack Overflow here, Stack Overflow there, trying to match my source code with what I found online, looking at manuals or whatever. It was tedious. Just tedious.

Ultimately I had something that was fun for five minutes at best. Often I just wanted to see if I liked something, but for that I had to create a prototype. And this prototype didn’t work. It didn’t compile.

I saw some repository, wanted it to work, then there was a compilation error. This module was lacking. This dependency wasn’t there. All of this shit.

So I’m coming back to it. Was I ever able to code? Or what is the benchmark for coding? And is it really a disservice to my intellect if I stop doing that and just have AI create it?

There are changes all the time. Repositories are not up to date. Libraries don’t work with each other. One updates, the other doesn’t. Then you have to fix it. It’s depressing and annoying, and I don’t really see the drawback of doing it differently now.

If a repository doesn’t do what I want, I load it, start Gemini CLI, and have it corrected. Reverse engineering protocols or hardware, in my experience, is disgusting. Really hard and frustrating.

So what is your take on the whole situation?

Discussion 7 comments · 3 points · Haeuserschlucht · 2026-01-10
Open on HN
Loading the discussion…

Domain filters

Stories from these domains are hidden from every list. Subdomains match too: blocking substack.com also hides danluu.substack.com.

    New collection

    Delete this collection?

    About YAVCHN

    YAVCHN is a reader for Hacker News and Lobsters, with articles and discussions in separate windows or Classic pages.

    Created by Paul Parks and built with PUDL.

    YAVCHN source code on GitHub

    Help

    Keyboard

    j / k
    Move down and up the story list. The arrow keys scroll whatever has focus.
    Enter
    Read the marked story in the article reader.
    ]
    Read the next story in the same article-reader applet. Back returns to the previous story.
    p
    Pin or unpin the marked story, which keeps it in Pinned.
    n / N
    Move to the next or previous top-level comment in the window in front.
    c
    Collapse or expand that comment.
    f
    Hide or show the story list.
    Esc
    Close a menu or this help.
    Access key m
    Go to the menu bar. Most browsers take it with Alt on Windows and Linux, and Safari with Control and Option.
    ?
    Show this help.

    Windows

    Each story opens in a window holding its article above its discussion; drag the bar between them to share the room differently. A window can be moved by its title bar, resized from any edge, snapped to a half or a corner by dragging it there, maximised, or minimised to the bar at the foot of the page. Use Window > New reader window to open an empty reader, or Story > Open in new reader window to open another reader for the current article. Docked readers keep their articles when you select another story from the sidebar. Minimized readers can be restored and reused for their site. A window's Next story link reads on down the list in the same window.

    A link in a comment or an article to another Hacker News or Lobsters thread opens that thread in a window too. A link to a single HN comment opens the comment above its replies.

    While a story's window is in front, the Story and Discussion menus in the menu bar hold its commands: pinning, Next story, sorting, collapsing every thread, jumping to the first new comment. Each window also remembers where you were in its article and discussion, so a reload, or Back to a story that Next took you past, finds your place again. Closing a window forgets it.

    The whole arrangement lives in the address, so a bookmark or a shared link brings it back, and Back undoes the last change. Moving between Hacker News, Lobsters, their lists, Pinned and Find changes only the list, and leaves the windows open.

    The list

    The pin at the start of a row keeps the story in Pinned, and the cross at its end hides it. Pinned can be narrowed by words in the title, site or author, by source, and to the stories you haven't opened yet, and ordered by when you pinned them, by points or by comments; the filters are part of the address, so a filtered view can be bookmarked. Scroll past the end of the list to load more. Domain filters, in the View menu, hide every story from a site.

    Collections are named lists of stories. Story > Add to collection files the story in front into one or more of them, and the Collections feed shows them all or one at a time; the menu that chooses collections also creates, renames, and deletes them. A note is your own text on a story. Choose Add note in a story's toolbar to write one; it saves as you type. Rows with a note carry the note mark, and the Notes feed lists every noted story and searches the text of your notes.

    Browsing view

    View > Windowed and View > Classic select the browsing view and save your default in this browser. Window view reuses a reader for each feed. Classic view opens stories and applets as pages. Open as a page is a one-off action that does not change your saved default. Use the Windowed selector to return an article to a window. Direct page links always open as pages.

    Applets

    The Applets menu in the menu bar holds three tools, each a window of its own. Replies to me takes your Hacker News user name and lists the replies to your last thirty comments and stories, checking again every three minutes while it is open, and marking what is new since you last marked them read. Look up a user opens a profile on Hacker News or Lobsters, with their submissions and recent comments, as a commenter's name in any discussion does; the bar at the top of a profile looks up someone else in the same window, and Back returns to the one before. Who is hiring? filters the posts of HN's monthly hiring threads by the words you type.

    They read only what the sites publish to everyone, so none of them asks for a login, and your user name stays in this browser anonymously and is included in retained applet state when signed in.

    Find

    Find takes any link and lists every time it was submitted to Hacker News and Lobsters, so you can read each discussion of it.

    About

    YAVCHN never sees your Hacker News or Lobsters login. The discussion is fetched from each site's public API; to vote or reply, follow the link above the discussion, or the arrow beside a comment, to the source's own site. Without a YAVCHN account, your data stays in this browser. When signed in, pins, collections, notes, blocked domains, and retained reading state are stored with your account and synchronized across devices. Hidden stories and layout stay in this browser.

    Open source: github.com/paulmooreparks/yavchn. Built with PUDL.