Why AI makes us smarter, not dumber – and what that has to do with your writing

Why AI makes us smarter, not dumber – and what that has to do with your writing

Often people are being afraid, especially in recent times, that AI is going to make them dumber.

AI is going to take over jobs, is going to do a lot of tedious work that is mentally also challenging, but because people stop doing it, they just don't challenge themselves and they get dumber and are more reliant on artificial intelligence.

And I wonder, well, is that really a bad thing? For instance, I'm not really good at phrasing.

I'm rather all over the place.

One thinking leads to another, one thought leads to another.

And I'm not really concise.

What I'm saying and writing is not really intended for print.

I have great ideas, but by reiterating and by repeating my statements, my train of thought just does not reach the target audience.

And now, of course, back in the day, you just practiced a certain style over and over again.

And then you had it ready and used it.

It was basically the best that you could.

And especially in marketing or when you have a business, it's all the time a challenge to do it right.

There are so many places, especially when you are involved with online marketing.

Probably everybody is because even if you have an offline product or a real product, you still have to market it and then it comes down to the internet.

So there's just so many areas that can go wrong.

You have to choose ads, you have to choose how to word your ads, you have to think about how to design your product, how to do the legal work.

There's just so many areas, just for the simplest product that you come up with, that it's daunting.

And is it really so bad to just say at some point, well, "I will just have an AI do it"? You know, this one, this creation here, I did not use AI autocorrect for.

But most other texts, I just admit to myself, I'm not that good at communicating.

I don't come to a conclusion, I meander, I talk about unrelated things, I am distracted, the core message is lost.

And I think most people can relate.

And yes, I'm aware if AI or computers were destroyed, and I would have to go back to a typewriter, I would have to start at the same level I was before.

So the question really is, realizing that you just don't get better at it, even if you practice, and when you compare your version with the version that AI created for you, you think, this is just so much better than what I wrote.

Should we still say, no, I dismiss it because it's AI, and I don't want to be dependent, or just say, you know what, this is just how life is.

I could wait forever, I can practice and all of that, and it doesn't get better, why not just use this? Because ultimately, what is writing for? It's to transmit my ideas.

And when the way that I'm writing or thinking does not transmit ideas well, but I want to transmit my ideas, why not rely on help? I mean, ghostwriters existed for a long time, who wrote thesis or even apology letters, all kinds of things, where Ghostwriting pretty much was coined by Tim Ferriss.

So yeah, that's really the question.

Why do it yourself, when it's just frustrating, and you're not moving anywhere, and you're wasting time, and obviously the same with a lot of programming, like you just wanted it done, and how did it work? Well, you had to look it up, and you had to go through some tutorials, and they were out of date.

Now you just say, you know what, this is what I want, and you get it, called vibe-coding.

And I know exactly, without AI, I couldn't create those things that quickly.

I would be significantly slower and it wouldn't work, and I wouldn't know why, and it would just be a nightmare.

Discussion 0 comments · 1 points · Haeuserschlucht · 2025-06-11
Open on HN
Loading the discussion…

Domain filters

Stories from these domains are hidden from every list. Subdomains match too: blocking substack.com also hides danluu.substack.com.

    New collection

    Delete this collection?

    About YAVCHN

    YAVCHN is a reader for Hacker News and Lobsters, with articles and discussions in separate windows or Classic pages.

    Created by Paul Parks and built with PUDL.

    YAVCHN source code on GitHub

    Help

    Keyboard

    j / k
    Move down and up the story list. The arrow keys scroll whatever has focus.
    Enter
    Read the marked story in the article reader.
    ]
    Read the next story in the same article-reader applet. Back returns to the previous story.
    p
    Pin or unpin the marked story, which keeps it in Pinned.
    n / N
    Move to the next or previous top-level comment in the window in front.
    c
    Collapse or expand that comment.
    f
    Hide or show the story list.
    Esc
    Close a menu or this help.
    Access key m
    Go to the menu bar. Most browsers take it with Alt on Windows and Linux, and Safari with Control and Option.
    ?
    Show this help.

    Windows

    Each story opens in a window holding its article above its discussion; drag the bar between them to share the room differently. A window can be moved by its title bar, resized from any edge, snapped to a half or a corner by dragging it there, maximised, or minimised to the bar at the foot of the page. Use Window > New reader window to open an empty reader, or Story > Open in new reader window to open another reader for the current article. Docked readers keep their articles when you select another story from the sidebar. Minimized readers can be restored and reused for their site. A window's Next story link reads on down the list in the same window.

    A link in a comment or an article to another Hacker News or Lobsters thread opens that thread in a window too. A link to a single HN comment opens the comment above its replies.

    While a story's window is in front, the Story and Discussion menus in the menu bar hold its commands: pinning, Next story, sorting, collapsing every thread, jumping to the first new comment. Each window also remembers where you were in its article and discussion, so a reload, or Back to a story that Next took you past, finds your place again. Closing a window forgets it.

    The whole arrangement lives in the address, so a bookmark or a shared link brings it back, and Back undoes the last change. Moving between Hacker News, Lobsters, their lists, Pinned and Find changes only the list, and leaves the windows open.

    The list

    The pin at the start of a row keeps the story in Pinned, and the cross at its end hides it. Pinned can be narrowed by words in the title, site or author, by source, and to the stories you haven't opened yet, and ordered by when you pinned them, by points or by comments; the filters are part of the address, so a filtered view can be bookmarked. Scroll past the end of the list to load more. Domain filters, in the View menu, hide every story from a site.

    Collections are named lists of stories. Story > Add to collection files the story in front into one or more of them, and the Collections feed shows them all or one at a time; the menu that chooses collections also creates, renames, and deletes them. A note is your own text on a story. Choose Add note in a story's toolbar to write one; it saves as you type. Rows with a note carry the note mark, and the Notes feed lists every noted story and searches the text of your notes.

    Browsing view

    View > Windowed and View > Classic select the browsing view and save your default in this browser. Window view reuses a reader for each feed. Classic view opens stories and applets as pages. Open as a page is a one-off action that does not change your saved default. Use the Windowed selector to return an article to a window. Direct page links always open as pages.

    Applets

    The Applets menu in the menu bar holds three tools, each a window of its own. Replies to me takes your Hacker News user name and lists the replies to your last thirty comments and stories, checking again every three minutes while it is open, and marking what is new since you last marked them read. Look up a user opens a profile on Hacker News or Lobsters, with their submissions and recent comments, as a commenter's name in any discussion does; the bar at the top of a profile looks up someone else in the same window, and Back returns to the one before. Who is hiring? filters the posts of HN's monthly hiring threads by the words you type.

    They read only what the sites publish to everyone, so none of them asks for a login, and your user name stays in this browser anonymously and is included in retained applet state when signed in.

    Find

    Find takes any link and lists every time it was submitted to Hacker News and Lobsters, so you can read each discussion of it.

    About

    YAVCHN never sees your Hacker News or Lobsters login. The discussion is fetched from each site's public API; to vote or reply, follow the link above the discussion, or the arrow beside a comment, to the source's own site. Without a YAVCHN account, your data stays in this browser. When signed in, pins, collections, notes, blocked domains, and retained reading state are stored with your account and synchronized across devices. Hidden stories and layout stay in this browser.

    Open source: github.com/paulmooreparks/yavchn. Built with PUDL.