Ask HN: Can someone at Microsoft help with identity verification?

Ask HN: Can someone at Microsoft help with identity verification?

Yes, it's happening again. A regular person needs to ask for help on HN because a major tech company has broken processes and refuses to offer support.

I'm trying to sign up for Trusted Signing Accounts, so I can obtain certificates to sign Windows executables. There's a plethora of reports online about how broken Azure's processes surrounding this are. The business number field won't even accept ABNs (Australian Business Numbers). The work-around is just to enter your ABN as a Tax Identifier and pray to whatever deity you may or may not believe in.

Next, you need to verify your identity. This process is especially broken. Microsoft DO NOT actually verify your identity. What they attempt to do is verify you own a domain. What that has to do with code signing, I'm not sure. However, they go out of their way to make this process nice and easy for fraudulent persons to exploit, but near impossible for regular people to adhere to. Specifically, they DON'T let you verify your domain via TXT records or ACME-style HTTP challenges etc. No instead, your options are:

1. Assignment letter from an authorized representative of the organization

2. Domain ownership records, such as Whois

3. Domain purchase invoices or registry confirmation records

4. Website showing name, address, contact information, and domain of the organization

You might be scratching your head as how any of these verify your ownership of the domain. Well. That's because they don't. But let's just play along for a little.

Here's what I've tried:

1. Done. They didn't accept it.

2. Done. They didn't accept it.

3. Impossible for domains bought via AWS. They don't provide itemised invoices. However, I tried to verify a second domain this way. This was also not accepted.

4. Done. They didn't accept it.

Every time I submitted, typically after hours of waiting, I was met with the canned response:

> Hello, Thank you for reaching out. We are unable to verify your account based on the information you’ve provided and are requesting additional information. To ensure that the information we have on record is verifiable and correct, please take the following steps to appeal your verification status. Please provide the domain registration or domain invoice from registration or renewal that lists the entity/contact name and domain as it is stated on your account. If it is not possible to provide additional documentation, please update your domain information to match the documents already provided. All documents submitted must be issued within the previous 12 months or where the expiration date is a future date that is at least two months away. Thank you, Vetting Operations Support

Now I don't know if the documents I submitted were up to their standards. My Whois records do NOT have domain privacy enabled and show both my name and my business name, so I'm not sure what's wrong there. However, the invoice I submitted for option 3 was generated by Porkbun. I think the only way they'd accept my document is if I created a forgery that perfectly displayed the exact information they're after. Which brings me back to my point about how this process is great for those with nefarious intentions. In my letter for option 1, I even included a link to the letter itself hosted at the root domain i.e. I attempted HTTP-style authentication. Nope. I also included my phone number, both an Australian and US number. They've made zero attempt to contact me via phone.

I'd really appreciate it if someone at Microsoft could:

1. Tell me why my submissions are actually being rejected.

2. Point out to the PM in charge of Trusted Signing Accounts that their processes don't validate anything and are ripe for abuse.

Validation attempt IDs are 4908d985-d2d7-492f-a8a5-4c1c78ee52f8, 59378d4f-3228-459d-88a6-a41f6004d518 and 1629d8b8-9740-4316-9bd3-c4220976e5a8.

Discussion 1 comments · 8 points · Benjamin_Dobell · 2024-12-13
Open on HN
Loading the discussion…

Domain filters

Stories from these domains are hidden from every list. Subdomains match too: blocking substack.com also hides danluu.substack.com. Type a domain, or paste a link to block its site, and press Enter.

New collection

Delete this collection?

About YAVCHN

YAVCHN is a reader for Hacker News and Lobsters, with articles and discussions in separate windows or Classic pages.

Created by Paul Parks and built with PUDL.

YAVCHN source code on GitHub

Privacy policy · Terms of use

Help

Keyboard

j / k
Move down and up the story list. The arrow keys scroll whatever has focus.
Enter
Read the marked story in the article reader.
[ / ]
Read the story above or below in the list, in the same article reader. Back returns to the story you came from.
p
Pin or unpin the marked story, which keeps it in Pinned.
n / N
Move to the next or previous top-level comment in the window in front.
c
Collapse or expand that comment.
f
Hide or show the story list.
Esc
Close a menu or this help.
Access key m
Go to the menu bar. Most browsers take it with Alt on Windows and Linux, and Safari with Control and Option.
?
Show this help.

Windows

Each story opens in a window holding its article above its discussion; drag the bar between them to share the room differently. A window can be moved by its title bar, resized from any edge, snapped to a half or a corner by dragging it there, maximised, or minimised to the bar at the foot of the page. Use Window > New reader window to open an empty reader, or Story > Open in new reader window to open another reader for the current article. Docked readers keep their articles when you select another story from the sidebar. Minimized readers can be restored and reused for their site. A window's Previous and Next buttons read up and down the list in the same window.

A link in a comment or an article to another Hacker News or Lobsters thread opens that thread in a window too. A link to a single HN comment opens the comment above its replies.

While a story's window is in front, the Story and Discussion menus in the menu bar hold its commands: pinning, Previous and Next story, sorting, collapsing every thread, jumping to the first new comment. Each window also remembers where you were in its article and discussion, so a reload, or Back to a story that Next took you past, finds your place again. Closing a window forgets it.

The whole arrangement lives in the address, so a bookmark or a shared link brings it back, and Back undoes the last change. Moving between Hacker News, Lobsters, their lists, Pinned and Find changes only the list, and leaves the windows open.

The list

The pin at the start of a row keeps the story in Pinned, and the cross at its end hides it. Pinned can be narrowed by words in the title, site or author, by source, and to the stories you haven't opened yet, and ordered by when you pinned them, by points or by comments; the filters are part of the address, so a filtered view can be bookmarked. Scroll past the end of the list to load more. Domain filters, in the View menu, hide every story from a site.

Collections are named lists of stories. Story > Add to collection files the story in front into one or more of them, and the Collections feed shows them all or one at a time; the menu that chooses collections also creates, renames, and deletes them. A note is your own text on a story. Choose Add note in a story's toolbar to write one; it saves as you type. Rows with a note carry the note mark, and the Notes feed lists every noted story and searches the text of your notes.

Browsing view

View > Windowed and View > Classic select the browsing view and save your default in this browser. Window view reuses a reader for each feed. Classic view opens stories and applets as pages. Open as a page is a one-off action that does not change your saved default. Use the Windowed selector to return an article to a window. Direct page links always open as pages.

Applets

The Applets menu in the menu bar holds three tools, each a window of its own. Replies to me takes your Hacker News user name and lists the replies to your last thirty comments and stories, checking again every three minutes while it is open, and marking what is new since you last marked them read. Look up a user opens a profile on Hacker News or Lobsters, with their submissions and recent comments, as a commenter's name in any discussion does; the bar at the top of a profile looks up someone else in the same window, and Back returns to the one before. Who is hiring? filters the posts of HN's monthly hiring threads by the words you type.

They read only what the sites publish to everyone, so none of them asks for a login, and your user name stays in this browser anonymously and is included in retained applet state when signed in.

Find

Find takes any link and lists every time it was submitted to Hacker News and Lobsters, so you can read each discussion of it.

About

YAVCHN never sees your Hacker News or Lobsters login. The discussion is fetched from each site's public API; to vote or reply, follow the link above the discussion, or the arrow beside a comment, to the source's own site. Without a YAVCHN account, your data stays in this browser. When signed in, pins, collections, notes, blocked domains, and retained reading state are stored with your account and synchronized across devices. Hidden stories and layout stay in this browser. The privacy policy has the details.

Open source: github.com/paulmooreparks/yavchn. Built with PUDL.